I suppose we started it...my generation of Viet Nam era survivors. The country was full of hippies and wanna-be hippies balanced by people who just couldn't understand hippies and punctuated by those who were just annoyed by the concept. Before that, women had a pretty good grip on the key to a man's heart, the key to his bank account and the key to his bedroom. It was a simple formula --confuse the dumb bastard. All you had to do to be a sexy woman was be the "other" gender. Men are inquisitive by nature. That's how they moved from the caves to the moon. They just can't resist a puzzle.
Before the hippies fucked up the landscape, women used the intrinsic power they are born with -- they're not men. They made a point of dressing like someone other than men. They walked differently. Their pursuits were different. Their ambitions were different. Their delights were unfathomable and their goals a complete mystery to any man who qualified as even mildly well adjusted.
But then one day a very dumb and resentful bitch (who goes nameless here, because she's had all the pub from me she's ever going to get...let the wretched whore be buried in a grave with no name) decided the pain she felt should be shared by women around the world. And so she started the National Organization for Women. Its hidden agenda was to rob all women of the power they enjoyed over men by taking away their mystique and reducing them to pale imitations of men. In Dumb Bitch's twisted mind, the women who possessed all the men she would never have needed to pay for being born women. And so it all began to fall away.
Fast-forward forty years. I no longer enjoy looking up a frilly skirt, because there are none. They're man enough to wear pants now. Even the occasional skirt is a disappointment when you see the word "Jockey" sewn into the waistband of her cotton underpants. It's like peeking into the men's locker room. The dainty high heels that used to strike such mysterious counterpoint to my clunky sneakers have been replaced by even clunkier sneakers. Each of them has more tattoos than my entire basic training squad had. I've discovered the provocative way in which they used to carry themselves is not endemic to the gender. It was affected for my benefit -- to turn me on. Now, they move just like any man. It was all a game designed to make me regard them as sexy, and I fell for it...and so did my daddy...and so did his daddy...and so did his daddy...and that's how I got here.
God bless the little tarts. Dumb Bitch has taught them the tactic of "divide and conquer". The "Good Ole Boys' Club was a place where men gathered to discuss, between notions of world conquest and pints of ale, how to understand the fairer sex. No mystery now. Just ask the cigar sucking female sitting in the chair next to you at the Good Ole Boys' Club.
We used to love going to war. We deluded ourselves into thinking a walk in harm's way was the price to pay for the honor of protecting the little gal back home. Now she's squatting in the next foxhole, mud-streaked cheeks spewing venom about the futility of battle while she takes out an enemy platoon with her AK47.
Watch her in the movies...she may weigh only 120 pounds, but she can beat the shit out of 3 highly trained FBI agents without breathing hard. She traded in the earrings and necklaces for hardware in her nostrils and a small spear though her tongue just to show you she's got the balls she took away from you.
She may not be able to grow a beard yet, but she'll shave her cunt to illustrate you ain't got nuthin' on her just because of your manly morning routine. The concept of a 'sexy woman' is so lost on her that even when she sets out to fleece you of a few dollars by imitating an alluring female she's lost to capture the look -- wearing high heels that more closely resemble combat boots. Dumb Bitch has convinced her that the bigger her feet look the more attractive men find her.
Really, it's okay. People still breed. But I'm not surprised that every third man you run into is gay...hell, why not? A cute young boy is more attractive than today's typical woman. At least he'll put on a skirt.
I just wonder sometimes if there are any women left in the country who know how to turn a man on without jumping on top of him, demanding he behave like a "bottom" and riding him like he was an ignorant bull. Beats there yet a heart within a single feminine breast still celebrating the difference between men and women, rather than filing lawsuits to mitigate it in the pursuit of EQUALITY. For chrissakes, men are not equal to women and women are not equal to men. There are only two kinds of people on the planet...the MEN and the WOMEN...whether you can tell them apart or not.
Copy & paste to friend: (Click inside box; Ctrl + C to copy; Ctrl + V to paste)
|
|
read more blogs!
|
lillin
|
Mar 5 @ 10:55AM
|
|
|
wow...how totally negative and defeatest!! I feel sorry that you dont find any women today alluring, feminine, or attractive...i like to think that when i put on makeup or some sexy lingerie that its not for me...
|
|
joltman20
|
Mar 5 @ 10:58AM
|
|
Your explantation of women versus men in the for real society is correct! If they want to have a cock and act act as if they do the leave them be! Cause I personally want the traditional women and they never change in their wants and needs, But project that WHY????????????? 
|
|
PrincessKissy
|
Mar 5 @ 11:30AM
|
|
Personally, I am much more the traditional female, believe that a man is a man, is in control in a relationship, should be dominant, etc. A woman should look like a woman, as much as possible, unfortunately, with the society we live in, it's not always possible. For the job I do, it's necessary for me to wear slacks and sensible shoes, half of what I do is warehouse, and it's just not reasonable for me to be climbing up on ladders dressed in heels and a skirt, nor is it really possible to be tossing 40-60 pound boxes around dressed that way. I'm trained to work in an office, and would be doing so if there were any positions available like that in the area I work in, but sadly, there are not, and I am forced to do what I do.
I do try, whenever possible to dress femininly, to wear make up and perfume, to be as "girly" as possible and to defer to my man in any way possible.
Not even gonna touch the shaving bit, as we have already gone rounds on this one! 
|
|
maggiemae1969
|
Mar 5 @ 12:11PM
|
|
I dont believe I like how that blog sounded, was pretty rough in language, however I will say this,there are still ladies here , that know how to act like one, I dont wear dresses, however my clothes dont make me who I am ,just as yours does not .. some of us do not desire to be the dominate person in the relationship,however men have gotten so accustomed to this that its hard to find one that is a leader.
So in short treat me how you want me to act, if you want a feminine lady , dont ask her to take out the trash and mow the lawn. Give us back the softer side of life and you may like what you see.
|
|
ShadowsAngel
|
Mar 5 @ 12:35PM
|
|
I'm so "old fashioned" that it's not even funny in MOST of my life. I cook from scratch (Got a fantastic pork roast on for dinner and will bake sweet potatoes and make a salad to go with it... along with an oatmeal cake with caramel icing for dessert...), sew, weave, spin, embroider, crochet, knit, etc... in my everyday life.
On the other hand... Professionally I am currently one of the only women in the world who inspects gas and oil production facilities and am one of the top small engine mechanics in the US as certified by Briggs & Stratton.
I'm an odd combination. I don't mind getting dirty but I would prefer to be able to stay home.
|
|
KaliMa
|
Mar 5 @ 1:01PM
|
|
Men are men and women are women they cannot be "equal" nor can an apple and an orange. Our bodies and minds are built for survival in differant ways.
If I have the education to do the same job I had better get the same pay.
No pants for me, only skirts, I wont say what my undies say. Dainty high heals would break my neck so I wear wedges. Lacy bras and thongs. Is that Sexy enough?
|
|
Firekeeper
|
Mar 5 @ 1:04PM
|
|
|
Okay, maybe this is just me, but I can't help but disagree with you. I think the idea of preconceived gender roles is well...infantile really. People are what they make for themselves, and if they want to act against what society calls the norm then whoopie for them. Some people buy into being what they're "supposed" to be and some people don't. Isn't it up to that person to decide what they want out of life? If you don't think that's sexy then hey, great for you. That doesn't mean that all of us guys (yes, I am a guy, I share an account with my fiancee who wanted the main picture) don't like a woman with a pierced tongue, spiked and dyed hair, and a little bit of social aggression. Feel free to speak for yourself but don't say that there aren't any sexy women out there anymore because it's all a matter of opinion.
|
|
tlc0766
|
Mar 5 @ 2:00PM
|
|
|
You know the thing is women can be versatile, In less than and hour I could go from being covered in hydraulic fluid and wearing combat boots to having my hair perfect, makeup on and in a mini skirt and high heels. I sometimes wonder if men aren't a bit intimidated by this, because yes I can be one of the guys, but I can also be a woman in all her glory!!
|
|
MEMEME69247
|
Mar 5 @ 2:52PM
|
|
I can be your perfect barbie,,,,dresses and stilettos,,,but I can put on a pair of jeans and blouse with High Heel Boots and still be that sexy woman,,,,,I am a True Girly Girl......No matter how I am dressed,,,I always have my dangling earrings,,,makeup,,,,perfum,,,,,and my hair is always in place....
Crissy,,,TLC,,,,and maggie I can can you are also True Girly Girls,,,,You are truly Power Puff Girls
|
|
skinonskin
|
Mar 5 @ 5:24PM
|
|
A woman is a woman no matter what she's wearing! My arms can certainly tell the difference between a man or a woman's body. If you doubt that, put your arms around a man and hug him the same way as you would a woman. If she's in my bed, I could care less if she's dressed like Conan the Barbarian- I said DRESSED like, not LOOK like.
One thing that turns me on is a woman dressed in good fitting jeans, a blouse and spiked heels- the rest of her body? Well that's why imagination is such a fantastic human trait! My imagination can see through anything, bricks, concrete blocks, buildings, women's clothing, most any material on this planet and it sees in 3D color too! 
Give me a warm, soft female body anytime, no matter how she's dressed! 
|
|
maggiemae1969
|
Mar 5 @ 5:26PM
|
|
gimme da POWER...... I want to be the pink one.... 
|
|
classandmore
|
Mar 5 @ 6:18PM
|
|
|
Hmmmmmmmm.
|
|
ValentineGirl214
|
Mar 5 @ 7:11PM
|
|
I used to be that woman, the one that wore dresses and skirts everyday. Put makeup and perfume on everyday. Not a hair out of place. Baked from scratch and and really enjoyed it. Then I got married and had a baby, then the MAN left and I had to take care of myself and my child, no child support mind you. So when I find a REAL MAN, I will start living like a REAL LADY again. Until then, I don't have the time or energy. I have to work for a living, mess with my stupid Van, try to fix things at home, and so on.
Gosh I sound a little demented!! 
|
|
Raven_Silverfire
|
Mar 5 @ 8:40PM
|
|
I have to disagree with you there. You paint every woman out there to be brainless brutes intent on bringing men down. I personally do not feel comfortable in a skirt and high heels, never have. I have always felt more comfortable hefting something around than sitting in a chair sewing holes in clothing up. I don't wear make up and i prefer a t-shirt and jeans, but i believe a lady and a woman are defined by their actions and attitude, and just because i don't wear dresses doesn't mean that i am any less a woman.
|
|
ladybootscooter
|
Mar 6 @ 12:25AM
|
|
hmmmmmmmmm those are some powerful pick up lines ya got going there!
Let me know how those work out for ya!
|
|
zena343
|
Mar 6 @ 12:15PM
|
|
Right on Raven, I agree with you, I also don't wear dresses much or wear make-up. I never have and it doesn't make me less of a woman either, HOPEFULLY!!  Never had any complaints anyway, so I guess it's all good!!
Zena
|
|
talkpro
|
Mar 6 @ 12:31PM
|
|
|
Zena...of course you and Raven are correct. The way you dress does not make you more or less a woman. Your DNA and selected surgeons control you gender. How much you eat and how little you exercise controls your size. My issue is NOT about how much of a "woman" you are. It is about how attractive you are. And if you think you are more attractive dressed like a male simply because no one is complaining, then you should reread my blog....SOMEBODY IS COMPLAINING. Surely you do not expect people to say to you, "By the way, Zena....you're not very attractive." Duh...
|
|
zena343
|
Mar 6 @ 1:00PM
|
|
|
Well I guess its a good thing for ME that your opinon doesn't matter to me, cause I don't know you, and you sure as heck don't know me!! Plus if all I have to do is put on a dress and make-up to make me attractive to people like you, then please, I would rather not be. Looks are skin deep. You should probably keep that in mind. But as long as they are all dolled up for you thats all that matters, so what they are a MEAN BITCH!! But hey as long as they look good that's all that matters, RIGHT!! GOOD LUCK TO YA!!!
|
|
zena343
|
Mar 6 @ 1:45PM
|
|
So I just want to know.............HOW'S IT WORKING FOR YA!!! NOT!! Guess what............ It's working for me JUST FINE!!!!
Obviously I dont need the fancy clothes to be sexy!!
And I am sure your going to have another snide remark to come back with. All ASSHOLES DO!!
|
|
talkpro
|
Mar 6 @ 4:45PM
|
|
So I just want to know.............HOW'S IT WORKING FOR YA!!! NOT!! Guess what............ It's working for me JUST FINE!!!!
Obviously I dont need the fancy clothes to be sexy!!
And I am sure your going to have another snide remark to come back with. All ASSHOLES DO!!
Your familiarity with assholes suggests you may be focusing on the wrong side of your dates. Try turning them around for greater satisfaction and more pleasing bouquet.
|
|
zena343
|
Mar 6 @ 4:59PM
|
|
|
I guess it was very convenient of you to take out one of your comments! Just goes to show how much of a MAN you are! But I will admit I have had some assholes as dates but they don't compare to the biggest of ASSHOLES and that's YOU!! And if sexy clothes makes a women attractive, that what the hell is going to help you, certainly not clothes or anything else, looks like your shit outta luck!
|
|
talkpro
|
Mar 6 @ 6:31PM
|
|
zena343 posted a comment on your blog entry "THE DAY SEXY WOMEN DIED". You must first approve the comment before it will become public.
Comment:
I guess it was very convenient of you to take out one of your comments! Just goes to show how much of a MAN you are! But I will admit I have had some assholes as dates but they don't compare to the biggest of ASSHOLES and that's YOU!! And if sexy clothes makes a women attractive, that what the hell is going to help you, certainly not clothes or anything else, looks like your shit outta luck!
I think you have satisfactorily made the case that you do not belong in a dress. I believe combat boots and fatigues would more accurately reflect your personality. After all, this "female thang" just ain't fer ever-body.
|
|
weasell_l
|
Mar 7 @ 5:37PM
|
|
|
See,,,you are the reason for old age homes...people get older, times change and they refuse to change with them, they get stuck in their rut and it is the way things are..the reason things change if for growth and the only thing yer growing is old. But,,I am sure you have better things to do than read this, like tell the kids to get off your lawn, and complain about....EVERYTHING!!!
|
|
talkpro
|
Mar 7 @ 6:15PM
|
|
weasell_l posted a comment on your blog entry "THE DAY SEXY WOMEN DIED". You must first approve the comment before it will become public.
Comment:
See,,,you are the reason for old age homes...people get older, times change and they refuse to change with them, they get stuck in their rut and it is the way things are..the reason things change if for growth and the only thing yer growing is old. But,,I am sure you have better things to do than read this, like tell the kids to get off your lawn, and complain about....EVERYTHING!!!
Please get off my lawn
|
|
lintroller
|
Mar 7 @ 6:49PM
|
|
This looks like a fun place!
First of all, her name is Betty Friedan, and to consider whatever you've ever said about her as "pub" is to flatter yourself. Call her a dumb bitch if you want, but it's hard to argue credibly that paving the way for equal rights for women was actually a step backwards. I don't think her goal was for women to look less attractive to men, but sure--maybe there's some symbolism in the explosion of pants-wearing, tattoo-sporting, short-haired donning women. So you're nostalgic--I get it, and I empathize, but I obviously can't sympathize. To me it just speaks to a discomfort with change. Styles evolve, and so do our notions of beauty; who's to say the period piece you've described is any more correct than one from a few hundred years ago? Would you laugh at a guy who pined for an evening gown from the Great Enlightenment?
Things are more complicated now, believe me, I understand that. Everyone's role is less clear, and that makes us all more stressed out. But the next time you see a woman who refuses to walk, dress, and act like the sex-bomb you want her to be, maybe it's because she'd rather (for instance) obtain a great job on her merits at equal pay than receive a dismissive and patronizing slap on the ass from one of your good ol' boys. And to say that there are no women today with classy, mysterious sex appeal is crazy talk. Can't fashion be allowed to evolve along with everything else?
|
|
talkpro
|
Mar 7 @ 7:25PM
|
|
ANSWER TO LINTROLLER'S COMMENT ABOVE
Well, it's about time we saw an intelligent (albeit naieve) reaction to this blog posting -- one not dripping with venom, overly-defensive or transparently framed to masque a hidden agenda. You're due a reaction, my dear, and here it is.
You make a very good point about how people, men (and women), become "stuck in time". I made that observation about my own grandfather when I was just a small boy, so it is not new thinking for me. And it is very true that men, at least, survive into old age still believing the most provocative look the opposite gender can affect is one which most precisely reflects the moment in their lives when their libido was "coming out". Forty years from now when women are wearing plastic jumpsuits and calling it fashion, the men who are today's teenagers will wish women still had a spear through their tongue and were emblazoned with tattooes all over their body. Again...no news to me.
But my quarrel is far more fundamental than the obvious metamorphosis fashion undergoes as time passes. I don't take exception to change, itself. My problem is with the fact that the change we are living through has blurred genders and a very important person -- she who possessed the feminine mystique (in posture, deportment, manner and sensibilities as well as fashion) has vanished and been replaced with a group of citizens who are nearly indistinguishable from my beer buddies. That's a little larger than the simple parade of fashion revisions New York exacts upon us.
And by the way...I am paid to share my opinions with thousands of people each morning in my work as a radio personality and when I refer to the "pub" I might, otherwise, give Betty Freidan it is not a presumption. I have no desire to add a morsel to her celebrity by repeating her name in any venue.
|
|
lintroller
|
Mar 7 @ 9:31PM
|
|
Well, now I have to eat crow about my "pub" comment, as I clearly stand corrected. Your sphere of listeners extends well beyond the AMD blogosphere.
All right, then... back to the topic at hand. The way you articulated your last point helps me to understand the type of woman who seems to aggravate you. She's kind of boyish, hangs out with boys, is as reckless as a boy, drinks with the boys, and can at least have a partially informed discussion about sports. And yes, she might flash a tongue ring and some tattoos, signifying that she's been through the mill in a way we previously only imagined men to experience. We've all met her, and she's a star in pop culture, exemplified by characters like the shared love interest in the movie "Keep the Faith" and really any youthful, female lead character anywhere these days. I know who you're talking about... she has insinuated herself into boydom to a sometimes excessive degree.
I don't argue that she exists. I do, however, disagree with your assertion that she somehow typifies today's woman in reality, pop culture BS and glorification notwithstanding. What about the classy, confident female professional who never could have existed 50 years ago? Does she really lack the ability to make a man go berserk? Not from where I'm standing. In my field of medicine, there are plenty of smoking hot women with enough mystique to leave me asking for more. Law, education, science, public servants, television personalities... everywhere I look, I can pick out examples of women who, at least on the surface, appear to have struck that balance between classic femininity and the progression of their gender. They're not all the grungy types that you describe, who, I might add, can be found in equal numbers in men of the same generation. So I think that the subset of "blurred" gender appearances is a shared experience between men and women, and not necessarily the byproduct of embittered feminists. I also think that there is too much diversity among women to overgeneralize, as I think you're doing here. It could be that we're exposed to a different crowd--you in Macon, I in New York--but I think that no matter where we live, it's hard to ignore the heterogeneity of America and the timeless, though evolving, ability of women to make men's jaws drop.
|
|
talkpro
|
Mar 7 @ 10:25PM
|
|
RESPONSE TO LINTROLLER'S COMMENT ABOVE
Amigo...I agree that we are surrounded by citizens of a different stripe -- you may find difficulty reaching intellectual sobriety among the denizens of a barely civilized cuture such as New York is home to, while I am easily elevated to a clearer understanding of human nature through the inspiration provided by the gentle folk of the south where I grew up. But let's not be flummoxed by geographic tunnel-vision as I have spent my adult life sharing time with listeners of WKBW/Buffalo, Y100/Miami, KPKE/Denver, Z93/Atlanta, WDRQ/Detroit, WNOE/New Orleans, 15 other ports of call in nearly as many cities and began my adult life as an actor during the 8-years I spent in Los Angeles before my broadcasting career began. After you have taken off the blinders your present isolated existence obliges you to suffer and been about the nation a bit, we may meet on a playing field where our observations are at least somewhat equally supported by education.
Your suggestion that there are worthwhile females who are not stained by the smack of over-amplified penis envy may have some foundation in fact, though such women provide paltry recompense for the soiled panorama their less decorous cousins have made of America, it does not speak to the point of the blog entry, and that is just this: There was once a precious flower among us. She is gone. I mourn her passing.
No amount of effort on the part of people born with a brain only 90% as large as mine will assist in the development of the great empire we MEN created of what was once a primitive back-country. Shedding aprons and silk panities for brogans and breif cases may have served the self-interests of the women who survive in her place, but who is to fill the delicate slippers she has abandoned along the way, and what is to become of this rapidly deteriorating culture when the best among us are brought to our knees daily by the headlong rush to mediocrity demanded by the feminist agenda, which seeks to group us all somewhere between the best that men can be and the best that women can do.
Finally, I read your profile. You are 30-years old and never even met the woman I'm speaking of, so you have no background at all to draw from in making such comparisons. Naturally, you will take what you can get from the current crop of fools sporting shaved cunts and crew cuts. Your male hormones will have it no other way. But to a man twice your age it is clear you have zero understanding of the women who preceded these people.
|
|
lintroller
|
Mar 7 @ 11:58PM
|
|
Whoa, there's bait everywhere in that response... let's see if I can avoid getting hooked. I just have to keep in mind that you make a living making good copy. I can accept that. Lord knows talk radio is not for the unopinionated.
... You are 30-years old and never even met the woman I'm speaking of, so you have no background at all to draw from in making such comparisons... But to a man twice your age it is clear you have zero understanding of the women who preceded these people.
(I'm omitting portions of your diatribe to conserve space, not to take them out of context. Just a heads up.)
Pulling the age card is a cop-out. Anyone motivated enough to become informed about the historical context in which we live can understand enough to have a discussion about social dynamics in eras long before their time. The bulk of scholarly literature about societies, in fact, is published by people who have pursued doctoral training in historical studies of all types. Is that a farce? Are they really so poorly equipped to talk about times in which they never lived? Absolutely not. Nothing equates precisely to living through an era, but many people living within those eras make a point of documenting their spirit for posterity; motivated successors can indeed make sense of, and speak intelligently about, what transpired in bygone times.
Now that that's settled...
I agree that we are surrounded by citizens of a different stripe -- you may find difficulty reaching intellectual sobriety among the denizens of a barely civilized cuture such as New York is home to, while I am easily elevated to a clearer understanding of human nature through the inspiration provided by the gentle folk of the south where I grew up.
Clearly meant to get under my skin, and it did elicit a chuckle, but I can't help commenting. Characterizing cities of the northeast, notably New York, as degenerate, uncivilized, or "depressing" (as described by your compatriot, and Macon favorite, John Rocker) is tantamount to attaching an anchor to whatever credibility you had remaining and dropping it over the Marianas Deep. Living in these cities affords people the opportunity to experience a far richer connection to the endless facets of humanity than one could ever hope to achieve south of the Mason-Dixon line. No offense intended to my genteel southern counterparts, but it's true. Your "clearer" understanding of human nature might better be described as "simpler," or at least offended by the complexities of the real world, which is forever dynamic.
After you have taken off the blinders your present isolated existence obliges you to suffer and been about the nation a bit, we may meet on a playing field where our observations are at least somewhat equally supported by education.
This is another attempt to discredit me through infantilization. Who's to say I'm not equally, or more, cosmopolitan than you? What have I done to portray myself as isolated? Age in years is not the sole determinant of wisdom; the latter is also a function of a lifelong commitment to cultivating personal growth and interpersonal understanding.
No amount of effort on the part of people born with a brain only 90% as large as mine...
The above and what ensues in its associated paragraph is filler... for entertainment purposes only. But consider me entertained.
There was once a precious flower among us. She is gone. I mourn her passing.
Crapola. She's an artificial idea borne of a romantic longing for uncomplicated times. The reason I never met her is because she doesn't exist and never did. The only thing different about women previously is that they were subjugated, and had little choice but to play the role designed for them by their warmongering men.
Now, you say you read my profile, so I took the liberty of reading yours. I have to be honest--I detect conflict. You say you seek "a woman who considers herself abnormal and wouldn't have it any other way," a woman who isn't a sheep. That defines quite precisely the modern woman much more than her forebears. Yet in this blog, you appear to do the opposite and place the sheep on the pedestal.
This flower you speak of... is it possible you were staring at a bud, and NOW she's in bloom?
|
|
Pudge2you
|
Mar 8 @ 8:43AM
|
|
Holy cow! point by point being taken to task! If this has a radio show he'd have already hung up on you. I've just got one question, or perhaps it's more of a statement. On the radios you've got to dwell on well known figures for a majority of your audience to have a chance to relate. So you end up making commentary on what amounts to pop culture. Most thinking folks in this country don't subscribe to pop culture, but rather use it for it's entertainment value.
So here we have an arguement, (and a good one at that...) between a thinking man and the intrument of pop culture itself.
CLICK... did you just hang up on me?
|
|
JJN4Fun
|
Mar 8 @ 9:04AM
|
|
You must be very happy, as ignorance IS bliss. This has got to be the biggest load of chauvinist shit I've seen in a long time. But, clearly, you come from an era when life was very different (not to mention coming from a part of the country that's been resisting social progress since - when, pre-Civil War?) On the other hand, I can't really say that age has anything to do with this way of backward (and backwoods) thinking, as my son isn't far off in his thinking and he's only 25 . But oh yes, he's a Southern Baptist preacher, educated in Theology in a southern state.
So what's next - you going to start in with some racist bullshit, too - why stop reinforcing southern stereotypes by attacking strong, intelligent, independent women...
|
|
talkpro
|
Mar 8 @ 12:27PM
|
|
RESPONSE TO Pudge2u ABOVE:
I'm delighted lintroller has lingered with the argument this long, but in order to respond to his latest entry I must be prepared to insert within insert within insert within insert. The argument has simply grown too complex for readers to follow, and this is for them. I already know what I think, and repeating myself profits no one.
I will offer this, however...I began the blog by saying the transformation of women from the cherished blossom whose passing I mourn to the wanna-be dude you must deal with today began during the reign of hippies -- roughly 1965. That was 2 years before lintroller was born. He says he knows all about the women I'm speaking of....he has seen pictures. But he cannot know the delicate perfume of her hair, the look in her eye when she did a double-take on you, the rhythm of her movement or the ease and grace with which she mounted the pedestal of worship we men placed her upon.
Sadly, neither do females his age know anything about the woman who could break a man's heart with a glance because that was the power her deportment commanded.
It is silly of me to engage a person lintroller's age on such a subject as this, and sillier still of lintroller to argue the difference between two things, one of which he could not possibly understand. In fact, it is a marvelous presumption on the young man's part to take an instructional tone with a man of my maturity. Far greater profit would come to him by asking questions. Every day for 30-years before he was born I was cramming my head with knowledge. And every day since his birth I have continued to learn. Does he think I was sleeping off a drunk somewhere in a ditch for the three decades before he was born? Does he think there was nothing of consequence to be learned before the day he was born?
This is the same sad mistake the hippies made when they protested the US entry into Viet Nam. They were unwilling to learn the lessons already known to the men in power who put us in Viet Nam. They were unwilling to examine the manner in which Adolph Hitler took over 5-countries without firing a shot because the US was too timid to intervene...a lesson well known to those who were there pre-WWII -- lost completely on the next generation of lintrollers who presumed the world began the day they were born.
As to your question about radio audiences and pop culture...the short answer is that there are all manner of radio talk shows. Some deal with pop culture, others with political subjects, some with automobiles, others with finance, etc.. The host guides the discussion according to the expectations he has created within the audience. Generally speaking, people interested in pop culture do not listen to talk radio...they listen to music. Even long time music hosts like Don Imus keep their distance from pop culture when doing all-talk.
|
|
Pudge2you
|
Mar 8 @ 1:00PM
|
|
now look I can't just let this one go old man...
Lint is 30 makes him born in '77ish (don't know the month) not '67 ish. Must be new math.
I was born 4 years after the time of which you speak. But if I had a dime for every codger that told me that he'd been doing this or that for the last forty years, and I should heed his experience, i'd be more retired than you.
The thing is, age in and of itself is no indication wisdom or intellect. You old farts don't understand that men have changed too in that time. Puking up the mistakes of the past and bemoaning their passing is your perogative, but history is rife with the casualties of shifting paradigms.
Have you even considered that the good ol' boy genie got out of the bottle in the '40's when women made the tools for the boys to go kill each other with? Isn't it logical progreesion through the 60's to where we are today?
Don't blame the modern woman for what you lost. Blame your Dad, and all his accumulated wisdom.
|
|
talkpro
|
Mar 8 @ 1:01PM
|
|
RESPONSE TO SxzeBBW ABOVE
Thank you for your very insightful entry. I am very pleased to represent Macon, Georgia as an example of the sort of citizen you can expect to find here. I would invite any interested reader to compare the prose you have offered in representation of your home town, Madison, Wisconsin, against my own prose and determine for him/her self where the most erudite, well-educated, talented and intelligent folk are to be found.
To further assist me in understanding your obvious disenchantment I took a look at your blog, hoping to locate the presumably lofty subjects which occupy your mind when you are not disparaging my peers. I read with great interest the entries; I LOVE PORN, DIRTY LITTLE FOUR LETTER WORDS, JUST WHAT IS WRONG WITH MY BOOBS and THE MOTHERFUCKER IS MARRIED. Very enlightening.
I feel your pain and understand why you have such a deep quarrel with anyone elevating the feminine mystique to embraceable stature. Thinking your objections might have sprung from your own less than dainty configuration, I was about to suggest you add the letters; BBW to your screen name, but then I noticed you were, once again, way ahead of me. You are a very pristine example of the “strong, intelligent, independent” women you defend in your entry...and, incidentally, my own son is a SUMMA CUM LAUDE grad of the University of Colorado. He was not born in a superstitious household where ghosts are thought to rule the Universe.
Regards to my friend Josh Wescott of Madison in the Morning/WIBA.
|
|
Pudge2you
|
Mar 8 @ 1:18PM
|
|
one more thing, I call BS on most of your direct reply to me every subject you mentioned as talk-radio fodder is POP-CULTURE including politics.
Ok ok there's no way ANYONE is gonna confuse Imus with pop culture! He is "Never Was" the king of has-been's.
|
|
talkpro
|
Mar 8 @ 2:24PM
|
|
RESPONSE TO Pudge2u ABOVE
Quite right about the math, Pudgy. Thank you for the adjustment, which makes my case even stronger.
Now I will return the favor by helping you struggle through the absurd, naive propaganda your mommy stuffed your head with while she was riveted to Cosmo and serving as a lieutenant at the NOW headquarters.
Women have been campaigning for what they now have since Millicent Fawcett founded the National Union of Women’s Suffrage in 1897...not since men went off to war during any of the manifold military engagements that followed the formation of the Suffragettes.
They have NOT been granted full partnership with men through their diligent efforts. It has NOT been the product of men asleep at the wheel. It has NOTHING to do with the need for two incomes, which was far more intense during the depression. It did NOT result from work-saving devices which freed her from drudgery at home. Nor did it occur as a result of overly-abusive slave masters who ruled women with a callous hand.
Listen, you poor, shallow puppet, and I will give you the gift of understanding which has so obviously eluded you throughout your intellectually tortured existence.
The success of feminists in this country is the direct result of the publication of a book called THE POPULATION BOMB, written by Stanford University biologist Dr. Paul Ehrlich and released in 1968. It illustrated mathematical progressions based on the prevailing rate of human population growth and outlined the fate of the species resulting from such irrefutably damning numbers.
The book was not read by the governments in such countries as India and China, where today roving bands of abortion enforcers and government limits on the size of families illustrate the folly of ignoring Dr. Ehrlich’s advice -- stop producing so many children.
It was, however, read by college students all over the country and it terrified us. When the old men on the Supreme Court read it, they realized the only thing standing between America and the fate NOW suffered by such countries as India was their willingness to ignore the limits of their Constitutional power and bring about a system of quotas to accomplish a very simple social goal -- give women a purpose in life outside the home where the babies are made.
In the years following that phenomenon, people in private business were forced to obey the court imposed demands to hire women. The result has been a declining population in the U.S. and we have been spared the fate now being exacted upon those governments who ignored Ehrlich’s warning.
Men and women were not meant to live together as husband and wife under this paradigm. A team without a final authority/leader is not a team at all -- it is anarchy, despite what the architects of your values have conditioned you to believe. The result has been the dissolution of the nuclear family, and the result of that has been a generation of father-less, lawless, AK47-toting teenagers without human sensibilities and without the historical context to understand why they are as they are.
In short, the movement of women out of the kitchen and the bedroom into the workplace is the regrettable but necessary result of the Supreme Court’s rape of the U.S. Constitution, following its decision to martyr itself on the altar of necessity. Thank god they did it and damn them to hell for the presumption.
And one for the road, you strutting imbecile...your attitude about people who are older than you are is endemic to the flock of fools, year by year, plunge this country further and further into the jaws of shame and intractable failure as America falls further and further down the ladder in nearly every category by which great empires are measured. When I was your age the U.S. led nearly every one of those categories. Now, we barely rank in the top 20 of any of them, from education to corporate power, dwarfed by nations such as Japan where the male of the species continues in his stewardship of families and finance.
More than any other single catalyst responsible for the decline of this once magnificent nation is the lack of deference you and people your age show to the men who led this country from the wilderness to world domination. Your notion that you know better than the “old farts” will come back to haunt you when America has sunk so low you know on a personal level what can only be lived out in third world countries at this moment in history.
|
|
Pudge2you
|
Mar 8 @ 2:54PM
|
|
I'll hand it to ya you do have talk-radio's flair for the flame, but don't blame me and mine old man.
You Boomers vote in droves. 90% of the governments federal and state are made up of you fools. And you're gonna need me and mine to pay for your delightful plunge into incontinence.
I can see that your incompetence as men has lead us all to this state. Your father's are the giants who's shoulders you stand on saying "me too, me too!"
But it's ok, my wife will wipe your drool, in pants, she only wears perfume and flowing skirts for me.
|
|
Pudge2you
|
Mar 8 @ 3:22PM
|
|
And.... I do like your rhetoric even if you kinda smear over the facts that don't support it. I'm thinking you got a future on "The Factor".
By the way, you wouldn't be selling ties or anything would you?
|
|
Looking4ever
|
Mar 8 @ 3:35PM
|
|
Oh, I just can't help myself. Yes, I can, but I don't want to.
Talkpro, you really just come off sounding like a whiny troll that pines away fro something he can't have. What happen? The women of today won't tolerate your bullshit attitude and, instead of blaming not getting laid on yourself, you blame the women of today? Boo hoo.
|
|
talkpro
|
Mar 8 @ 3:52PM
|
|
RESPONSE TO Looking4ever ABOVE
My word. Are there no limits to the trasparency you people are prepared to illustrate. Anything to hurt my feelings. Nothing is taboo. Do you really think you are denigrating the message in this blog entry with all these pointless, baseless personal insults to the author? Simply because you are unable to personally measure up to the vanished woman does not impune the fact that she existed, she was worshipped, she was loved and you are not her.
Looking4ever..you poor pathetic flat tire. LOOK AT ME!. READ ME!. Too bad you cannot HEAR me. Do you honestly think I have trouble getting laid? The problem is that it's too difficult to find among you somebody worth fucking.
|
|
lintroller
|
Mar 8 @ 11:37PM
|
|
I think we beat the original horse to death and will have to agree to disagree, but since the OP managed to stray off topic, I'll join him for a moment.
Your point about the decline of America's status in the world is well taken. It would show an unforgivable lack of foresight to presume that we'll be on top of the world forever. I think the neocons are far more to blame than the petulant, powerless youth of today; however, if you really believe that younger generations such as my own bear the brunt of responsibility for our country's downturn through lack of deference--and by the way, I have great admiration for our forebears generally, if not you specifically--then just remember this: your generation reared us.
Our dog trainer once told us that if our puppy did something wrong--say, nipped at us or peed on the floor--we should grab a newspaper, roll it up, and whack ourselves three times with it.
|
|
talkpro
|
Mar 9 @ 2:55AM
|
|
RESPONSE TO LINTROLLER ABOVE
I want to suggest a book to you called ATLAS SHRUGGED, written by Russian-born philosopher Ayn Rand and published in 1957. By way of recommending this 1000-page plus novel I offer this:
From an article entitled: "Scandals lead execs to 'Atlas Shrugged,' written by Del Jones and published in USA TODAY:
Top books that made a difference in people's lives:
1. The Bible*
2. Atlas Shrugged, Ayn Rand
3. The Road Less Traveled, M. Scott Peck
4. To Kill a Mockingbird, Harper Lee
5. The Lord of the Rings, J.R.R. Tolkien
* — a large gap exists between the No. 1 book and the rest; based on 2,032 responses from Book-of-the-Month Club members,1991, in survey co-sponsored by Library of Congress' Center for the Book
I could easly write 2,000 words on Rand and/or the book, but I will say only that it is a mammoth condemnation of the phrase "I'm not responsible" and, once-read, it will change your life and point of view forever.
|
|
classandmore
|
Mar 23 @ 6:36PM
|
|
Now, pray tell me, what happened to gentleman of the old school, who never curse in front of a woman, walk on the outside toward the street, open doors, pull out chairs, are willing to seduce and woo a woman, not just chase her, waiting for his opportunity to jump her bones? A real man who knows women and what makes them tick, what makes them swoon, what touches their hearts? A man who can laugh at her and with her, but be compassionate and sympathize with her when things are bad? One woman men who prefer one woman to love and are not out being players or cheaters or flirts? Men who know what they are looking for in a woman and go after it? Men who would never let a woman pay for a day, and NEVER expect her to? Real men, sexy men.
Now, this list could go on and on, so can YOU measure up?
|
|
classandmore
|
Mar 23 @ 6:38PM
|
|
|
Sorry, pay for a date. And by the way, men who don't have to take their shirt off to attract a woman, but know how to dress.
|
|
classandmore
|
Mar 24 @ 7:06PM
|
|
|
Gee, thought I could give a negative kudo and gave a postive on instead, ouch.
|
|
classandmore
|
Mar 25 @ 3:35PM
|
|
|
By the way, sexy is not the way you dress, not anything that you can put on, it is a quality, innate, you can see it in a man or woman's eyes, the way they use their hands, the way they smile, not in the way they dress or don't dress. If you got it, you don't have to flaunt it, everyone KNOWS you got it. The ones who flaunt it, usually don't have it.
|
|
whisperingcomet
|
Mar 29 @ 9:07PM
|
|
|
Hey, my friend,,,look at my photos,,,women still exsists
|
|
TandAHookup
|
Apr 16 @ 12:44PM
|
|
This is the beginning of my profile on matchdoctor....you should see that I am not one of the women you talk about in your missive. I agreed with what you had to say about a woman being a woman, and how it affects their relationship with their man.
" If you were my man...you would be spoiled rotten. I love to pamper you....all over massages are just the beginning. I am an excellent cook, and having one of your favorite meals ready when you get home is one of the ways I like to spoil you. I love football, and would enjoy watching it with you......also, I have a halftime show of my own. *wink* I am a sensual woman who loves pleasing her man. There is very little I wouldn't do to keep you completely satisfied sexually.....and I enjoy it as much as he does.
Now, for a little about me as a person. I am intelligent, funny, loving, honest and respectful. I am not demanding.....I prefer to make you so happy you WANT to give me whatever I want!"
|
|
JOYCE1948
|
May 2 @ 7:22PM
|
|
|
the man doth protest too much. seems he has serious male issues. if he needs a woman to be dumb, submissive and in an inferior position, like they were in the 50s and acting like stupid little coquettish jerks to please their man, like in the country western songs, than I guess he just doesnt know what a real man is.... a guy who doesnt need a wimpy barbie doll to feel masculine. oh well......
|
|
ShadowsAngel
|
May 22 @ 8:46PM
|
|
Joyce; I am going to put this here although I truly do not expect that you will ever read it. Part of the reason that I am putting it here though is because I choose to and because the old adage about assuming things is true. When you ASSUME you make an ASS of yourself and others.
if he needs a woman to be dumb,
Talkpro has never suggested in any of his blogs, in any of his emails to people, in any of his resposes to people or anywhere in his profile that he is seeking a woman who is "dumb". To insinuate that the women who preceeded this current generation of women were lacking in intelligence is foolhardy in the extreme.
The women of 100 years ago knew something that the women of today, for the most part, do not. They knew how to BE women. Simply being a female of childbearing age does NOT make one a woman any more than possessing a penis makes one a man.
submissive and in an inferior position,
Being a wife and mother is neither "submissive" nor is it "inferior". We would not need the entire village to raise a child if mothers were able to BE mothers as opposed to having to assume roles which they were never intended to assume other than through necessity.
One of those things that needs to be understood is that I spend 100% of my time at work in a male dominated industry and am one of a mere handfull of women in the world who is capable of doing my job. If ever there was a woman who "should" be able to understand your point of view it is me. Unfortunately, what I see is a woman who appears to actively dislike the male of the species unless they are either pussy-whipped or homosexual. I personally prefer the man in my life to be a man so that I can be a woman without all of the bovine excrement.
acting like stupid little coquettish jerks to please their man,
I am going to ask you a question here... and then make an observation. If one chooses to please the man in their life are they a "stupid little coquettish jerk" in your opinion?
If it is my choice to do something, as an educated professional woman, then I am not acting, being stupid, being coquettish or being a jerk. What I am being is a woman who has made a choice to do something that I wish to do. Regardless of what you think of that decision, the choice is still mine to make and all of the condemnation from people such as yourself makes not a bit of difference when it comes to my choices.
While you may have the "right" to express your opinion in certain limited circumstances, you should not ever believe that your opinion carries any more weight with someone else than the commode sitting in the plumbing department at Lowes has.
|
|
DeDe54
|
May 22 @ 9:09PM
|
|
Frankly, a woman is a woman, a man is a man. There are differences, however, as far as clothing, makeup, tattoes, whether she wears high heels or stockings is of no consequence.... You know come to think of it, I will leave my 2 cents worth out of this, it will just get more vexatious to all. 
|
|
slicknwet121
|
Jun 4 @ 7:16PM
|
|
|
agian i am moved to comment in a positive way to your writings.if you open my closet right now you will find more skirts and dresses than pant suits , i wish more women felt that way. feminity is a lost art form and should definatly make a comeback
|
|
|