I opened my mail today. I have as of yet to have read everything, but many things were quite clear. This battle was quite winnable {and I believe that it still is], and to have withdrawn my complaint shall have set this man backwards...
The easy way for this action to prevail is for Congress to override the 11th Amendment, and I knew about all of that. I think that that is the wrong approach. This has nothing to do with the 11th, contrary to the District Court's analysis, respectfully. ...That is one of the reasons why I did not pursue this as a Section 1983 claim. I believe the correct Statute is 14141, oddly enough.
At least I have something to occupy my time...
Copy & paste to friend: (Click inside box; Ctrl + C to copy; Ctrl + V to paste)
|
|
read more blogs!
Blogs by Pornosaurus:
|
|
|
| U.S. District Court of SC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wordsofwit
|
Feb 10 @ 3:49PM
|
|
|
I respectfully recognize your passion and sense of justice. But, in my ignorance, is this post in reference to an incident, involving alleged an PI charge that you blogged about before? I am not passing judgment, merely looking for reference points.
|
|
Pornosaurus
|
Feb 10 @ 5:36PM
|
|
As for reference points, I motion that the PI (and by that, I assume you mean, {alleged} public intoxication) be over with for any one of three reasons... The cop was moonlighting unfortunately... and I seem to like coercing guards to assault me in jail...
At this point, I think it either comes down to Section 14141, Alabama v. Pugh, 438 U.S. 781 (1978), and/or Seminole Tribe of Florida, 517 U.S. 44, 58 (1996)... then again, I might be wrong...
|
|
chocolatemilf
|
Feb 10 @ 7:13PM
|
|
Well it seems to totally consume your time Don........is this gonna be worth the time spent?  Just asking..........It's been far too long to give up......
|
|